ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2025
Long-term Survival Analysis From PERLA, A Phase II Randomized Trial of Dostarlimab With Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab With Chemotherapy in Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.
Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04581824 (A Randomized, Phase 2, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dostarlimab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Phase 2, Double-blind Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Dostarlimab Plus Chemotherapy Versus Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy in Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: PERLA is a global, double-blind, phase II trial comparing anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibodies, dostarlimab, and pembrolizumab in combination with chemotherapy (D+CT and P+CT, respectively) in patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC without actionable genomic aberrations in the first-line setting. Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive not more than 35 cycles of 500 mg dostarlimab or 200 mg pembrolizumab, with less than or equal to 35 cycles of 500 mg/m Results: At the end of the study (September 10, 2024), the median follow-up time (mo) for PFS was 30.4 for D+CT and 30.4 for P+CT. The median PFS (mo [95% confidence interval (CI)]) was 8.8 (6.9-11.0) for D+CT and 6.8 (4.9-7.1) for P+CT (hazard ratio 0.77 [95% CI: 0.58-1.03] at 79% maturity). The median follow-up time (mo) for OS was 35.5 for D+CT and 35.2 for P+CT. The median OS (mo [95% CI]) was 20.2 (14.5-27.3) and 15.9 (11.6-19.3), respectively (hazard ratio 0.75 [95% CI: 0.55-1.02] at 70% maturity). Safety profiles were similar between arms and consistent with previous analyses. Conclusions: This long-term analysis reaffirms previous observations that D+CT exhibited similar efficacy to P+CT and exhibits strong clinical efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Clinical trial registration: NCT04581824.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.