Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080022›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025

A Pilot Evaluation of Expert and Novice Use of the Functional Analysis Risk Assessment Decision Tool.

Ali C Schroeder, Stephanie M Peterson, Mashiath Binti Mahabub, Morgan K Dresch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Functional Analysis Decision-Making Considerations.Behavior analysis in practice · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ali C SchroederDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, 903 W. Michigan Avenue, Mail Stop #5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5439 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2545-6082
Stephanie M PetersonDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, 903 W. Michigan Avenue, Mail Stop #5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5439 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6611-9301
Mashiath Binti MahabubDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, 903 W. Michigan Avenue, Mail Stop #5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5439 USA.
Morgan K DreschDepartment of Psychology, Western Michigan University, 903 W. Michigan Avenue, Mail Stop #5439, Kalamazoo, MI 49008-5439 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Risk assessment and evaluation before behavioral assessment and intervention is required by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board® (BACB®) Ethics Code for Behavior Analysts (BACB, 2020). Methods to do so and potential factors to consider are not readily available. Deochand et al. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-024-01006-z.

Indexed as

Ethical decision makingFunctional analysisRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID41080022
PMCPMC12508403

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.