Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41080015›Full record

ArticleBehavior analysis in practice2025

How Behavior Analysts Make Ethical Decisions: A Qualitative Study.

Elizabeth M Kelly, Kaitlin Greeny, Nancy E Rosenberg, Ilene S Schwartz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavior analysis in practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Characteristics of Qualitative Research in BehaviorBehavior analysis in practice · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elizabeth M KellyCollege of Education, University of Washington, Haring Center, Box 357925, 1981 NE Columbia Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8587-5767
Kaitlin GreenyCollege of Education, University of Washington, Haring Center, Box 357925, 1981 NE Columbia Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
Nancy E RosenbergCollege of Education, University of Washington, Haring Center, Box 357925, 1981 NE Columbia Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.
Ilene S SchwartzCollege of Education, University of Washington, Haring Center, Box 357925, 1981 NE Columbia Road, Seattle, WA 98195 USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Behavior analysts (BAs) frequently face professional ethical dilemmas. When faced with these dilemmas, BAs must problem solve and decide how to ethically respond. Though BAs have many tools available to guide their ethical decision making (e.g., Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-023-00804-1.

Indexed as

Behavior analysisEthical decision makingEthical dilemmaEthics

Identifiers

PMID41080015
PMCPMC12508416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.