Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079977›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2025

Prevention of spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension during caesarean section using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring: A randomised clinical trial.

Midoriko Higashi, Kazuhiro Shirozu, Makoto Sumie, Taichi Ando, Taiki Akasaka, Yasuo Yumoto, Satoshi Hojo, Ken Yamaura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Midoriko HigashiFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Kazuhiro ShirozuFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Makoto SumieFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Taichi AndoFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Taiki AkasakaFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Yasuo YumotoFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Satoshi HojoFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).
Ken YamauraFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan (MH, MS, KY), the Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan (KS, TAn, TAk), the Fukuoka Birth Clinic, Fukuoka, Japan (YY, SH).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9392-1746

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypotension following spinal anaesthesia during caesarean section is common and can negatively affect the mother and child.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess whether spinal anaesthesia-induced hypotension could be prevented using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring.

designRandomised controlled study.

settingThis single-centre study was conducted at a Japanese hospital from 13 May 2020 to 27 April 2022. PATIENTS: Women (

interventionThe participants were randomised via simple randomisation into the estimated continuous cardiac output-guided vasopressor administration (esCCO group) or control group. Blood pressure was measured at 2.5-min intervals following intrathecal 10 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine injection. Patients in both groups received a single dose of vasopressor (phenylephrine 100 μg or ephedrine 4 mg) if they had hypotension (systolic BP <100 mmHg and/or mean BP <65 mmHg) or nausea. In the esCCO group, phenylephrine was also administered if the esCCO decreased by 10% or more from baseline.

main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was the proportion of patients with hypotension (systolic blood pressure < 100 mmHg and/or mean blood pressure < 65 mmHg) between the spinal anaesthesia injection and delivery. The secondary outcomes were nausea and vomiting, reactive hypertension (systolic BP ≥ 140 mmHg), and umbilical arterial blood pH. Fisher's exact test and Student's

resultsThe incidence of hypotension was 43/88 (49%) in the control group and 20/103 (19%) in the esCCO group (

conclusionThe incidence of hypotension may be reduced using estimated continuous CO monitoring, however, no differences were seen in the incidence of nausea or reactive hypertension, nor in umbilical arterial pH levels.

trial registrationUMIN-CTR Clinical Trial Database identifier: UMIN000040066.

Identifiers

PMID41079977
PMCPMC12513451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.