Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079954›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025

Unraveling indications for discharge antibiotics: the Devil's in the details.

Ritika Prasad, Marten R Hawkins, Radhika Arya, Alex N Zimmet, Leah Mische, Emily Mui, Esther Esadah, Samaneh Pourali, David R Ha, Marisa Holubar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ritika PrasadDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8553-7119
Marten R HawkinsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8387-0823
Radhika AryaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-3108-8083
Alex N ZimmetDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-0043
Leah MischeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1210-2883
Emily MuiDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Esther EsadahChildren's National Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-4826-9473
Samaneh PouraliDepartment of Pharmacy, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA, USA.
David R HaDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Marisa HolubarDivision of Infectious Diseases and Geographic Medicine, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7585-1809

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Discharge is a pivotal transition of care moment; however, discharge antibiotic stewardship efforts have historically been limited. Our institution has a mandatory indication field for inpatient antibiotic orders. Using the last-ordered inpatient antibiotic indication ("Last Inpatient Indication"), we assessed the utility of this field compared to the ICD-10 in inferring clinician intent for discharge antibiotics, to forgo the need for manual chart review to assess antibiotic appropriateness. Methods: We extracted electronic medical record data on adult inpatient encounters in 2023 with ≤2 discharge antibiotics. We reviewed a random subset of 300 encounters to determine if the ICD-10 or Last Inpatient Indication had higher agreement with clinician intent for discharge antibiotics, as determined by chart notes. To facilitate comparison, we created a dictionary classifying ICD-10 indications. Results: We included 3,414 encounters. The most common discharge antibiotics were amoxicillin/clavulanate (24%) and ciprofloxacin (15%). The most common ICD-10s were non-infectious (48%) and sepsis (18%). In the subset of chart-reviewed encounters, the Last Inpatient Indication agreed with the documented clinician intent for discharge antibiotic more often than the ICD-10 (84% vs 28%). Applying institutional guidelines, we were able to use the Last Inpatient Indication to assess appropriate duration and choice of discharge antibiotics for select infections. Conclusions: The Last Inpatient Indication outperformed ICD-10s in inferring clinician intent for discharge antibiotics and can be used to efficiently assess antibiotic appropriateness without need for manual chart review. Usefulness of ICD-10s was limited by high percentage of non-infectious and sepsis codes.

Identifiers

PMID41079954
PMCPMC12509150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.