ArticleAntimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE2025
Risk factors for surgical site infection following hysterectomy: nine-year experience at a large safety-net hospital network in New York City.
Article in Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To identify risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) following abdominal hysterectomy in patients cared for in a large urban public hospital system. Design: Retrospective case control study. Setting: Multicenter safety net hospital system. Participants all: Women undergoing hysterectomy from 2015-2023. Methods: Propensity score matching, using Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) risk variables, created control groups. Receiver operating characteristics curves were created using current and augmented risk adjustment variables. Results: There were 6142 hysterectomy surgeries reported during the 9-year time period, with 160 (2.61%) with reportable SSIs. Compared to a matched control group, patients with SSIs were more likely to be of Black race, to have longer duration of surgery, to have open surgery (vs. laparoscopic), and to have received a clindamycin ± gentamicin for surgical prophylaxis. The addition of duration of surgery, endoscopic surgery, and wound class to current CMS risk variables significantly improved the prediction for SSI when all SSIs were included, but did not when patients with superficial SSIs were excluded from analysis. Conclusions: Predicting SSIs following hysterectomy is complex and current CMS risk assessments are overly simplistic. Until more robust and comprehensive risk assessment criteria are developed, use of SSIs following hysterectomy as a quality measure for reimbursement should be reconsidered.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.