ArticleInternational archives of otorhinolaryngology2025
Performance of Children with and without Auditory Processing Disorders in Adaptive Temporal Gap Detection Measures.
Article in International archives of otorhinolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Children with auditory processing disorder (APD) exhibit various auditory processing deficits, including temporal processing deficits. Temporal processing abilities are assessed by estimating the gap detection threshold (GDT) as the lowest perceivable gap duration identified by the subject. Objective: The present study attempted to examine the performance of normal-hearing children and children with APD using adaptive within-channel and across-channel gap detection tests. Methods: Two groups of children aged between 10 and 12 years participated in the study. Group 1 included children diagnosed with APD, and group 2 included normal hearing, typically developing children (TD), with 12 participants in each group. For each subject, the lowest detectable gap duration was obtained monoaurally, using broadband noise (BBN), within-channel (narrow bands of noise centered spectrally at 2 kHz on either side of the gap), and across-channel (narrow bands of noise leading marker spectrally centered at 2 kHz and trailer marker spectrally centered at 1 kHz) gap detection tests through the Psycon platform (free). Results: The results of the statistical analysis revealed significant group differences only in across-channel GDT measures between the two groups. In contrast, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in terms of either within-channel GDT or BBN GDT. Conclusion: The results indicate that, compared to other stimuli, an across-channel gap detection test would be a better diagnostic test of temporal resolution to identify and assess children with APD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.