ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Does it mean more positive or more negative? A study on central attitudes toward homosexuality.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: Attitudes toward homosexuality have a significant impact on the well-being of sexual minority populations. Although prior research has identified the multidimensional nature of attitudes toward homosexuality, the central components within the attitudinal structures remain underexplored. This study aimed to examine the central attitudes toward homosexuality from the perspective of both attitudinal measurement and attitudinal inference. Methods: The current study comprises two complementary studies. By assessing 666 participants' attitudes toward homosexuality, study 1 utilized complex network analysis to identify central components within the overall attitudinal network. Study 2 adopted an attitudinal inference design to further investigate the central factors of attitudes toward homosexuality, using importance and representativeness as key indicators of centrality. Paired-sample Results: Our results of study 1 showed that the component reflecting behavioral tendencies related to social interactions is the most central in the attitudinal network. Findings of study 2 revealed that Conclusion: This study advances our understanding of attitudinal centrality in measuring and inferring attitudes toward homosexuality, which can offer nuanced intervention targets to reduce homonegativity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.