Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079860›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025

Effect of cognitive bias modification training on body image dissatisfaction in adolescents with anorexia nervosa or depression-a pilot feasibility randomized controlled crossover study.

Eva Glombitza, Piers L Cornelissen, Martin J Tovée, Tanja Legenbauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eva GlombitzaFaculty of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Piers L CornelissenDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Martin J TovéeDepartment of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Tanja LegenbauerFaculty of Medicine, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Body image disturbance presents transdiagnostically with an impact on the development and maintenance of psychiatric disorders. Addressing body image disturbance, a cognitive bias modification training (CBM) was developed using a two-alternative forced choice task (2-AFC) to alter patients' individual perceptual boundary between what they classify as a fat versus a thin body. This pilot study aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the paradigm's feasibility and efficacy in adolescents in a clinical context. Methods: This pilot study included adolescent inpatients aged 13-17 years diagnosed with (atypical) anorexia nervosa ( Results: Mixed ANOVAs showed that the 2-AFC CBM paradigm significantly shifted the categorical boundary over 10 days, altering patients' individual perceptual boundary but did not improve the body image specific psychometric measures. Linear regression indicated training effects on diagnosis-specific characteristics, and Discussion: These findings confirm the feasibility and effectiveness of the 2-AFC CBM paradigm in adolescent inpatients transdiagnostically with further larger randomized controlled effectiveness trials required. The study suggests including normal-weight patients with anorexia nervosa only and not using confirmatory feedback as a control condition, but as an orientation and confirmation of a healthy weight limit.

Indexed as

adolescentsanorexia nervosabody image dissatisfactioncognitive bias modificationdepression

Identifiers

PMID41079860
PMCPMC12510976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.