ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Re-validation of the Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-revised among Chinese university students majoring in vocal music.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Under the spotlight: social anxiety and music performance anxiety in solo-exposed wind instrumentalists compared to section players in orchestra settings.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The effects of AI second opinions on collaborative confidence and decision-making: evidence from a controlled study of postgraduate vocal accompanists.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Self-regulated vocal health in undergraduate vocal music education: a qualitative needs analysis.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Evaluative threat as an internal dimension of music performance anxiety among Chinese university music students.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The cognitive engine of evaluative threat: socially prescribed perfectionism and Music Performance Anxiety-a moderated mediation analysis of rumination and self-compassion.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Due to its significant impact on performers' psychological well-being and career development, music performance anxiety (MPA) has recently received growing public attention. The Kenny Music Performance Anxiety Inventory-Revised (K-MPAI-R) is one of the most widely focused MPA scales, often used to assess the manifestations and influencing factors of MPA in musicians across different genres and professional stages. However, most current K-MPAI-R validation studies did not distinguish between vocal and instrumental performers. As they differ significantly in performance settings and stressors, these variations may impact the validity of the scale and lead to biased results. Methods: With Kenny's permission, this study aims to re-examine the reliability and validity of the K-MPAI-R in the context of Chinese university students majoring in vocal music. 736 Chinese students participated in this study. The researchers divided the total sample into two equal subsamples, each consisting of 368 students. One subsample was subjected to exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and the other to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results: Through EFA, the researchers obtained a four-factor model (F1: Psychological Vulnerability, F2: Proximal Somatic and Cognitive Anxiety, F3: Parental Support, F4: Memory Self-Efficacy); subsequently, CFA was employed to confirm that the model demonstrated a good fit and exhibited adequate reliability and validity. Discussion: This study represents the first refined validation of the K-MPAI-R scale for Chinese university students majoring in vocal music, providing cross-cultural and discipline-specific evidence for optimizing measurement tools to assess MPA among vocal performers accurately.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.