ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2025
A non-invasive approach to awake mouse fMRI compatible with multi-modal techniques.
Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Anesthesia, perimortem conditions, and brain harvest method govern the measured metabolome: analysis of substandard samples generates flawed metabolite levels.Oxford open neuroscience · 2026Article
- Biphasic acclimation for simultaneous wide-field fluorescent CaImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Longitudinal resting-state fMRI of awake mice during habituation: stress, head motion, and functional connectivity.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Longitudinal, simultaneous wide-field fluorescent Ca2+ imaging and fMRI in awake mice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mouse functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies contribute significantly to basic fundamental and translational neuroscience research. Performing fMRI in awake mice could facilitate complex tasks in the magnet and improve translational validity by avoiding anesthesia-related neural and neurovascular changes. Existing surgical approaches provide excellent motion control but are not desirable for all experiments aiming to scan awake mice. These include studies with transgenic mouse lines that are vulnerable to anesthesia or mice in longitudinal studies involving cognition. To address these needs, we propose a non-invasive restraint to scan mice in the awake state. The restraint was designed to be compatible with brain stimulation and recording approaches often combined with fMRI. It was evaluated on the basis of motion, fMRI data quality, and animal stress levels, and compared to a conventional headpost restraint. We found the proposed approach was effective at restraining mice across a broad range of weights without the need for any anesthesia for setup. The non-invasive restraint led to higher data attrition after censoring high motion volumes, but by acquiring roughly 25% more data we could obtain comparable network spatial specificity to the headpost approach. Our results demonstrate a simple open-source head restraint that can be used for awake mouse fMRI for certain cohorts, and we establish suitable acclimation and scanning protocols for use with this restraint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.