ArticleBrain communications2025
Evidence of clinical and brain recovery in post-COVID-19 condition: a three-year follow-up study.
Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dynamic recovery of piriform cortex function and its impact on cognitive processing speed following mild COVID-19.BMC neurology · 2026Article
- Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Review
- Longitudinal modeling of Post-COVID-19 condition over three years: A machine learning approach using clinical, neuropsychological, and fluid markers.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Dynamic multivariate patterns of brain structure-neuropsychiatric symptom associations in long COVID.Brain communications · 2026Article
- From HIV to SARS-CoV-2 associated neurological disorder ("HAND" to "SAND"): Viral infection as a "time-bomb" for the aging brain.Neuroscience applied · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fatigue and cognitive dysfunction linked to persistent brain changes have been reported for up to two years after COVID-19. In this study, we followed the clinical, neuroimaging and fluid biomarker trajectories over three years post SARS-CoV-2 infection to evaluate potential signs and underlying factors of brain recovery. We conducted a monocentric, longitudinal study using resting-state functional and structural T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 51 patients with post-COVID-19 condition (mean age 50 years, 33 female) collected at a mean time of 6, 23 and 38 months after COVID-19 infection. The trajectory of brain changes was compared to 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age 37 years, 13 female) with similar time intervals between brain scans and analysed in relation to clinical, neuropsychological and fluid biomarkers including interleukins and neurodestruction markers at all timepoints. In addition, hand grip strength to evaluate muscular fatigue was assessed at the final follow-up visit. Self-reported fatigue improved over time but was still moderate on average three years after COVID-19 infection, while measures of hand grip strength and cognitive performance were largely unaffected. We found a significant increase of both lateral ventricles (∼8%) and the third (∼6%) ventricle accompanied by a structural volume reduction in adjacent areas including the thalamus, pallidum, caudate nucleus and putamen. An increased neuronal activation pattern was widespread and pronounced in these areas. The brainstem no longer exhibited volume loss as reported in our pervious study, but enhanced functional connectivity. Laboratory markers including interleukins and neuronal injury markers remained within the normal reference ranges across all study timepoints. Our study revealed an overall slow but evident clinical improvement, including improved fatigue, regular muscular strength and recovery as well as normal cognitive function without signs of systemic inflammation three years after COVID-19. Clinical improvement is reflected by a pattern of brain recovery along periventricular regions. This pattern is characterized by structural stabilization and increased connectivity starting in the brainstem as well as efficient neuronal recruitment and increased activation in the basal ganglia, with no evidence of neuronal injury. These results highlight the positive long-term recovery trajectory in post-COVID patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.