Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079753›Full record

ArticleBrain communications2025

Evidence of clinical and brain recovery in post-COVID-19 condition: a three-year follow-up study.

Ravi Dadsena, Sophie Wetz, Anna Hofmann, Ana Sofia Costa, Sandro Romanzetti, Stella Andrea Lischewski, Christina Krockauer, Carolin Balloff, Ferdinand Binkofski, Jörg B Schulz and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Clinical utility and prospective of TMS-EEG: Updated review from an international expert group.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ravi DadsenaDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7387-0750
Sophie WetzDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Anna HofmannGerman Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), 72076 Tübingen, Germany.
Ana Sofia CostaDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1999-6616
Sandro RomanzettiDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Stella Andrea LischewskiDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Christina KrockauerDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Carolin BalloffDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany.
Ferdinand BinkofskiJARA Brain Institute Molecular Neuroscience and Neuroimaging (INM-11), Research Centre Jülich and RWTH Aachen University, 52056 Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6750-943X
Jörg B SchulzDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Kathrin ReetzDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9730-9228
Julia WaldersDepartment of Neurology, RWTH Aachen University, 52074 Aachen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fatigue and cognitive dysfunction linked to persistent brain changes have been reported for up to two years after COVID-19. In this study, we followed the clinical, neuroimaging and fluid biomarker trajectories over three years post SARS-CoV-2 infection to evaluate potential signs and underlying factors of brain recovery. We conducted a monocentric, longitudinal study using resting-state functional and structural T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging data from 51 patients with post-COVID-19 condition (mean age 50 years, 33 female) collected at a mean time of 6, 23 and 38 months after COVID-19 infection. The trajectory of brain changes was compared to 23 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (mean age 37 years, 13 female) with similar time intervals between brain scans and analysed in relation to clinical, neuropsychological and fluid biomarkers including interleukins and neurodestruction markers at all timepoints. In addition, hand grip strength to evaluate muscular fatigue was assessed at the final follow-up visit. Self-reported fatigue improved over time but was still moderate on average three years after COVID-19 infection, while measures of hand grip strength and cognitive performance were largely unaffected. We found a significant increase of both lateral ventricles (∼8%) and the third (∼6%) ventricle accompanied by a structural volume reduction in adjacent areas including the thalamus, pallidum, caudate nucleus and putamen. An increased neuronal activation pattern was widespread and pronounced in these areas. The brainstem no longer exhibited volume loss as reported in our pervious study, but enhanced functional connectivity. Laboratory markers including interleukins and neuronal injury markers remained within the normal reference ranges across all study timepoints. Our study revealed an overall slow but evident clinical improvement, including improved fatigue, regular muscular strength and recovery as well as normal cognitive function without signs of systemic inflammation three years after COVID-19. Clinical improvement is reflected by a pattern of brain recovery along periventricular regions. This pattern is characterized by structural stabilization and increased connectivity starting in the brainstem as well as efficient neuronal recruitment and increased activation in the basal ganglia, with no evidence of neuronal injury. These results highlight the positive long-term recovery trajectory in post-COVID patients.

Indexed as

ALFFCNSfatiguelong COVIDMRI

Identifiers

PMID41079753
PMCPMC12508649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.