ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Comparison of oliceridine and sufentanil in patient - controlled intravenous analgesia for post - thoracoscopic nausea and vomiting: a prospective, double - blind, randomized controlled trial.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus sufentanil in perioperative anesthesia and analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2026Pooled it
- Oliceridine versus sufentanil: a systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative nausea and vomiting.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Impact of oliceridine versus sufentanil on postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing thyroid surgery: a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial.Annals of medicine · 2026Trial
- Oliceridine versus Sufentanil on Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in Women Undergoing Gynecological Laparoscopic Surgery: A Randomized Double‑Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Efficacy and safety of oliceridine versus sufentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia following gynecological laparoscopic surgery: a randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Oliceridine and Hydromorphone for Postoperative Analgesia in Adults Undergoing Lower Limb Fracture Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Non-Inferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Comparison of Postoperative Analgesic Efficacy of Oliceridine and Sufentanil in Total Laparoscopy Hysterectomy, a Clinical Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Comparison of oliceridine and sufentanil in postoperative pain management for postoperative nausea and vomiting after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery: an exploratory randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Trial
- Oliceridine versus Sufentanil for Postoperative Recovery and Opioid-Related Adverse Events in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Lobectomy: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- Effect of Oliceridine on the Acute Postoperative Pain Management After Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Non-Inferiority Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
- The Satisfactory Analgesia and Minimal Emesis of Elderly Patients After Thoracoscopic Lung Surgery: Oliceridine versus Sufentanil in a Randomized Controlled Trial.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare oliceridine and sufentanil in patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) for reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in thoracoscopic surgery patients. Methods: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial enrolled 130 patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University from December 2024 to February 2025. Patients were randomly assigned to oliceridine (Group O, n = 65) or sufentanil (Group S, n = 65) PCIA groups. General anesthesia combined with nerve block anesthesia was used intraoperatively, followed by PCIA post-surgery. The primary outcome was PONV incidence within 48 h. Secondary outcomes included nausea and vomiting scores, pain scores, rescue analgesia and antiemetic use, recovery indicators, and adverse reactions. Results: Baseline and intraoperative characteristics were similar between groups. The primary outcome (48-h PONV incidence) was significantly lower in Group O (32.3% [21/65]) than Group S (50.8% [33/65]; P = 0.033; OR = 0.46, 95% CI [0.23-0.94]), especially within 24 h postoperatively. Moderate-to-severe PONV was also less frequent in Group O (18.5% vs. 38.5%, P = 0.012; OR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.16-0.81]). Early postoperative pain scores were similar, but Group S had higher Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores after 12 h (P < 0.05), though the absolute differences were small (e.g., median resting VAS of 0 vs. 1 at 48 h). Rescue analgesic demand and PCIA use showed no significant difference. Group O had significantly higher Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) scores (median difference at 24 h: 5.0 [95% CI 1.2-8.8]; P < 0.05) and significantly lower Athens Insomnia Scale scores (median difference at 24 h: 1.0 [95% CI -2.3 to -0.5]; P < 0.05) compared to Group S. Adverse reaction rates, including dizziness, nightmares, hallucinations, respiratory depression, dry mouth, allergy, and bradycardia, were similar between groups. Conclusion: In high-PONV-risk thoracoscopic surgery, oliceridine-based PCIA significantly reduced PONV incidence compared to sufentanil (32.3% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.033), while also demonstrating superior recovery quality (QoR-15) and sleep outcomes (AIS). This establishes oliceridine as a procedure-specific analgesic option for enhancing recovery beyond conventional opioid-sparing effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.