ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2025
Effects of a Quadricep-Dominant vs. Functional Training Program on Activities of Daily Living, Functional Performance, and Motor Unit Recruitment in Older Adults.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigated the effects of a quadriceps-dominant (QD) versus functional (FX) training program on the Functional Movement Screen (FMS), activities of daily living (ADLs), and motor unit (MU) recruitment of the vastus lateralis (VL) and biceps femoris (BF). Twenty-six older adults (68.9 ± 5.1yrs) were randomly assigned to a 6-week QD or FX training program. Participants completed ADLs, FMS, and three closed-kinetic chain exercises (CKCs): front lunge (FL), side lunge (SL), and bilateral squat (BLSQ), pre and post-intervention. Electromyography was recorded from the VL and BF during maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) and CKCs. Raw EMG recordings during CKCs were normalized to MVICs, and analyzed for root mean square (RMS). The QD program resulted in improved FMS performance during a deep-squat (p = 0.003), in-line lunge (p = 0.013), and hurdle step (p = 0.034), as well as improved ADL sit-to-stand (STS) and STAIRS (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the QD program resulted in greater RMS of the VL during CKCs (p < 0.05). Lastly, a positive correlation was observed between ADLs and RMS of the VL (p < 0.05, r > 0.6), whereas negative correlations were observed between FMS movements and RMS of the BF (p < 0.05, r < -0.6). The results suggest that a QD program may lead to greater improvements in functional movements, ADLs, and VL MU recruitment compared to a FX program. Additionally, MU recruitment of the VL is essential for functional ability, whereas high MU recruitment of the BF may coincide with reduced functional ability. The results of this study suggest that QD training may improve functional abilities in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.