Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079620›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Bridging human and animal personality: A behavioral test to assess reward sensitivity.

Susana C M Ferreira, Fabiana De Angelis, Sarah Ambruosi, Giulia Ferroni, Matteo Chincarini, Charlotte Goursot

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Susana C M FerreiraDepartment of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
Fabiana De AngelisInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, Wien, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Sarah AmbruosiInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, Wien, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Giulia FerroniInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, Wien, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Matteo ChincariniDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Teramo, SP18, 64100 Teramo, TE, Italy.
Charlotte GoursotInstitute of Animal Welfare Science, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, Wien, 1210 Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accounting for individual differences in depression or resilience is crucial to ensure individualized well-being. Differences in tendencies to approach rewards and avoid threats reflect personality and help to understand what animals want and like. At the neural level, these tendencies involve the behavioral activation system (BAS) and the behavioral inhibition system (BIS). We developed a test to investigate reactions to rewards and approach-avoidance conflicts using the domestic pig as a model. After testing 101 piglets, we showed that this test is reproducible, highly repeatable, and linked with classic personality dimensions assessed with four established personality tests. We report on individual tendencies related to approach-avoidance conflicts (BIS) and reward responsiveness (BAS), which are connected to specific personality traits. These findings address the gap between human and non-human animal personality research. Our study explores individual differences in perceived rewards, which have strong implications in promoting positive animal welfare and mental health.

Indexed as

Animal sciencePsychologySocial sciences

Identifiers

PMID41079620
PMCPMC12513275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.