Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079610›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Sparse memory ensembles set brain-wide network states to sustain learned associations.

Josué Haubrich, Gabriele Russo, Denise Manahan-Vaughan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Josué HaubrichMedical Faculty, Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Gabriele RussoMedical Faculty, Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Denise Manahan-VaughanMedical Faculty, Department of Neurophysiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to recall spatial memories and adapt behavior to changing conditions underlies efficient navigation. These processes are thought to rely on sparse populations of neurons, embedded within distributed brain networks. Here, we sought to address how these neurons impact large-scale network connectivity to sustain behavior. We tagged neurons that were active during an appetitive spatial memory task in TetTag-hM3Dq mice and chemogenetically reactivated these ensembles during fMRI. The reactivation of these ensembles triggered widespread network reorganization, optimizing modular specialization while maintaining integration via key hubs and gateways. We identified distinct clusters dominated by the ventral and dorsal hippocampus that exhibit unique connectivity with cortical and subcortical areas. While control mice showed effective extinction learning (EL), reactivating the tagged memory ensembles prevented EL. These findings reveal brain-wide hubs that support spatial memory and indicate that decay of this network connectivity is likely an essential facet of effective EL of spatial experience.

Indexed as

Cellular neuroscienceNeuroscienceSystems neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41079610
PMCPMC12514527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.