ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
The independent value and clinical significance of angio-based microvascular resistance in predicting adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Angio-based microvascular resistance (AMR) may influence the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, its value as an independent predictive marker remains unclear. Methods: This study included 483 patients diagnosed with STEMI who underwent PCI between January 2021 and July 2023. The patients were classified into high and low AMR groups based on the AMR threshold. The relationship between AMR and MACE was assessed using multivariate logistic regression analysis, and the cumulative incidence of MACE was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cutoff value for AMR and its predictive efficacy. Results: During the 12-month follow-up period, the cumulative incidence of MACE was significantly higher in the high AMR group than in the low AMR group ( Conclusion: AMR holds independent prognostic value for predicting MACE, with an optimal cutoff of 246.5 mmHg·s/m, facilitating early risk stratification by identifying high-risk patients. Additionally, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and elevated NT-proBNP levels were significantly associated with an increased risk of MACE. A low postoperative quantitative flow ratio also correlated with a higher MACE risk, further highlighting the impact of coronary blood flow restoration on patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.