Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079556›Full record

ArticleGlobal cardiology science & practice2025

An empirical study on the impact of genetics and gender and its consequences in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

Anshuman Gupta, Harneet Singh Khurana, Gurmeet Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global cardiology science & practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anshuman GuptaDayanand Medical College & Hospital Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Harneet Singh KhuranaDayanand Medical College & Hospital Ludhiana, Punjab, India.
Gurmeet SinghDayanand Medical College & Hospital Ludhiana, Punjab, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGender-associated variations in phenotypic expression and their consequences are established in numerous cardiac circumstances. However, their impact is questionable in the case of HCM.

objectiveTo investigate the demographic and clinical profiles of the HCM patients. Also, to compare the echocardiographic features according to the HCM subtypes in the study populace. METHODOLOGY: The present study was conducted at the DMCH, Ludhiana, from March 2019 to May 2021, using a prospective observational and non-blinded design. The data regarding demographic and clinical profile are gathered for the specified duration. The clinical features are confirmed through the Echocardiography. The gathered data are analyzed through chi-square to determine the differences among the groups with the aid of the SPSS tool. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The demographic profiles and clinical assessment of 103 patients are analyzed. The subjective assessment reveals that HCM is predominantly in males in a ratio of 2.1:1. Dyspnea is a chief complaint of both genders (77.67%). Apical type is prevalent in male HCM patients. MYBPC3 and MYH7 are the general mutations found in the genetic tests. SCD is found in patients possessing this type of genetic mutation. The non-obstructive type is more common than the obstructive type.

conclusionsHCM is a chronic disease and causes morbidity as well as mortality globally. HCM patients are vulnerable to SCD and stroke. These risk factors rely on the diagnosis associated with age, gender, obstruction, obesity, and coronary diseases. Hence, the present research on the demographic characteristics of HCM patients promotes awareness regarding the complications among the Indian populace.

Identifiers

PMID41079556
PMCPMC12513463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.