Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079555›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Redefining digital health interfaces with large language models.

Fergus Imrie, Paulius Rauba, Mihaela van der Schaar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fergus ImrieDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paulius RaubaDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mihaela van der SchaarDepartment of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Digital health tools have the potential to significantly improve the delivery of healthcare services. However, their adoption remains comparatively limited due, in part, to challenges surrounding usability and trust. Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose models with the ability to process complex information and produce human-quality text, presenting a wealth of potential applications in healthcare. Directly applying LLMs in clinical settings is not straightforward, however, as LLMs are susceptible to providing inconsistent or nonsensical answers. We demonstrate how LLM-based systems, with LLMs acting as agents, can utilize external tools and provide a novel interface between clinicians and digital technologies. This enhances the utility and practical impact of digital healthcare tools and AI models while addressing current issues with using LLMs in clinical settings, such as hallucinations. We illustrate LLM-based interfaces with examples of cardiovascular disease and stroke risk prediction, quantitatively assessing their performance and highlighting the benefit compared to traditional interfaces for digital tools.

Indexed as

cardiovascular diseasedigital healthlarge language model (LLM)LLM agentsrisk score

Identifiers

PMID41079555
PMCPMC12511092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.