Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079551›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in artificial intelligence2025

Integration of AI and ML in regenerative braking for electric vehicles: a review.

Zacharia Prakash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zacharia PrakashDepartment of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Calicut, Kozhikode, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric vehicle technology has grown rapidly in recent years due to battery advancements, environmental concerns and supportive policies. Regenerative braking systems play a critical role in improving energy efficiency by converting kinetic energy into electrical energy, thereby extending battery life and vehicle range. However, conventional regenerative braking faces challenges in energy recovery, comfort, and adaptability. Optimizing energy recovery ensures prolonged battery life by preventing overcharging or undercharging, making EVs more sustainable and cost-effective. This review paper explores the integration of Artificial Intelligence and machine learning techniques in regenerative braking systems to overcome these challenges. This study examines AI techniques such as regression models, neural networks, deep reinforcement learning, fuzzy logic, genetic algorithm and swarm intelligence based techniques for regenerative braking. The study also compares AI-based strategies with traditional braking methods. Unlike previous studies, which focus on individual AI techniques, this paper provides a comparative analysis of multiple AI approaches, assessing their impact on braking performance and energy recovery, and propose a hybrid AI framework. This paper covers challenges in real-time implementation, road adaptability, and vehicle control integration. This paper also discusses future research that optimize braking performance like V2X communication, edge computing, and explainable AI etc.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceelectric vehiclesenergy recoveryfuzzy logicmachine learningneural networksregenerative breakingreinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID41079551
PMCPMC12507741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.