ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2025
The Effect of a KN95 Mask on High-Intensity Interval Training Performance, Physiological Response, and Perception.
Article in International journal of exercise science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of a KN95 mask on the performance, physiological response, and perception of high-intensity interval training (HIIT). Twenty college-aged participants (Male: 10, Female: 10) completed a two-visit, crossover, counterbalanced study. The HIIT workout included four 1-minute "all-out" intervals at 3.5% of body mass with 4-minute rest intervals, performed with or without a KN95 mask. Following HIIT, participants remained on the cycle ergometer for a 15-minute recovery period. For each interval, peak power and average power were recorded. Throughout the HIIT workout and recovery, heart rate, blood lactate, muscle oxygenation, perceived exertion, and perceived recovery were measured. All data were assessed using trial×time ANOVAs with post hoc pairwise comparisons. Alpha level was set to p<0.05. All data are presented as mean±standard deviation. No significant interactions were noted for peak power (p=0.432), average power (p=0.674), blood lactate (p=0.533), perceived exertion (p=0.221), perceived recovery (p=0.333), or muscle oxygenation (p=0.991). A significant main effect of trial was noted for heart rate during recovery, with higher heart rate during the masked trial compared to control. A KN95 mask did not affect performance, physiological response, or perception during HIIT, though it led to elevated heart rate during recovery. These results suggest KN95 masks may not impair HIIT performance but can influence short-term post-exercise heart rate recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.