ArticleCureus2025
Needling With Continuous Infusion Into the Anterior Chamber in Eyes with Bleb Failure After PreserFlo MicroShunt Implantation.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The PreserFlo MicroShunt (PMS) is a minimally invasive glaucoma device; however, filtration failure due to subconjunctival fibrosis remains a clinical challenge, and the role of bleb needling after PMS implantation remains unclear. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of bleb needling combined with continuous infusion into the anterior chamber to treat filtration failure after PMS implantation. Four consecutive pseudophakic eyes underwent the procedure, which involved anterior chamber infusion with balanced salt solution and lysing adhesions with a 27-gauge needle under surgical microscopy. No intraoperative complications were observed. During follow-up, repeat needling was required in three eyes, and only one eye required the addition of intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering medication. None of the eyes underwent additional glaucoma surgery, and IOP was lower than that before the PMS implantation. No ocular infections occurred throughout the clinical course. These findings suggest that, although the IOP-lowering effect of needling with continuous infusion into the anterior chamber after PMS implantation is limited compared to trabeculectomy, the technique may help maintain IOP control and avoid reoperation in select cases. The method also allows for safer manipulation by estimating tube position and performing adhesion lysis under controlled irrigation. However, its use is restricted by the need for operating room facilities, resource demands, and limited insurance coverage. While this small case series cannot establish definitive conclusions, the results suggest that bleb needling with anterior chamber infusion may represent a useful alternative to reoperation for PMS filtration failure, which warrants further investigation in larger studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.