ReviewCureus2025
Analgesic Effectiveness of Magnesium Sulfate as an Adjuvant to Local Anesthesia in Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is the most commonly used method for inducing pulpal anesthesia in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis (SIP). Magnesium sulfate has been reported to increase the anesthetic effectiveness for endodontic procedures. Whether the adjuvant use of magnesium sulfate with IANB is effective in SIP patients remains uncertain. We performed an electronic search on PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), and Cochrane CENTRAL from inception to September 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the adjuvant use of magnesium sulfate with IANB and local anesthesia compared to IANB with local anesthesia alone in patients with SIP. The primary outcome of interest was the pain scores following one and two hours post-procedure, while the secondary outcome was the anesthetic success rates. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random effects model. All analyses were performed using STATA 19MP. Seven RCTs comprising 398 patients were included in the final analysis. The adjuvant use of magnesium sulfate was associated with significant reductions in post-procedure pain scores at one hour (SMD = -1.97, 95% CI: -3.18 to -0.77,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.