Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079465›Full record

ArticleThe Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS2025

Development and Evaluation of a Medication Adherence Measure for Inhaler Use Among Patients with Asthma.

Woranuch Saengcharoen, Nisanat Nanual, Sanguan Lerkiatbundit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Malaysian journal of medical sciences : MJMS, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Woranuch SaengcharoenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.
Nisanat NanualDepartment of Pharmacy and Consumer Protection, Somdejpraboromrachineenart Natawee Hospital, Songkhla, Thailand.
Sanguan LerkiatbunditDepartment of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Prince of Songkla University, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Limited scales exist for assessing adherence among inhaler users, and information on validity and diagnostic characteristics is lacking. This study aimed to develop a Medication Adherence Measure for Inhaler Users (MAM-I) and assess its reliability, validity, and cutoff score for determining nonadherence in patients with asthma. Methods: A cross-sectional study, which included 145 patients with asthma, was conducted. The participants completed the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), the Marlowe-Crowne Social Desirability Scale (MCSDS), and the 7-item MAM-I. The reliability of the scale was determined using Cronbach's alpha, and its validity was examined in terms of criterion, concurrent, predictive, and construct validity. The diagnostic characteristics and cutoff point for nonadherence to inhaler use were also evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, with asthma control at month 6 as the gold standard. Results: The MAM-I showed a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.784 at baseline and 0.749 at month 6. Significant correlations were found between the MAM-I scores and adherence scores ( Conclusion: The MAM-I shows satisfactory reliability and validity, with good diagnostic properties and a cutoff score of less than 15. This scale can be a helpful tool for identifying inhaler nonadherence in asthma management.

Indexed as

asthmadevelopmentinhalermeasuremedication adherence

Identifiers

PMID41079465
PMCPMC12513512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.