ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
Life cycle assessment of pharmaceutical tablet manufacturing: A comparative analysis and systems model integration framework.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuous Manufacturing of Controlled-Release Metoprolol Succinate Tablets by Novel Hot-Melt Fragmentation Technology.AAPS PharmSciTech · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pharmaceutical drug products in the form of tablets are produced via a series of manufacturing steps, transforming powder blends to compacted granules with carefully selected properties such as tensile strength and dissolution time. Typical oral solid dosage form (OSD) manufacturing processes include direct compression (DC), roller compaction (RC), high shear granulation (HSG) and continuous direct compression (CDC). Design of each process step is required to achieve end-product quality for the specific material properties and available equipment, although design decisions are typically made without a quantitative understanding of the impact on product environmental footprint. Using a 'cradle-to-gate' life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology, a quantitative sustainability comparison has been made between standard OSD manufacturing platforms across different production scales. The results demonstrate that for small batch sizes, DC produces tablets with the lowest carbon footprint, however at larger batch sizes, CDC is the most carbon efficient manufacturing platform. Due to the high carbon footprint of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API), formulation process yields had the greatest impact on overall carbon footprint, although emissions from equipment energy, cleaning and facility overheads were also analysed. Data from these LCA models has been combined with systems models of the CDC manufacturing processes. These combined models are used to demonstrate the optimisation of processes to meet robust product quality attribute targets whilst identifying opportunities to minimise the drug product carbon footprint.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.