Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079388›Full record

ArticleTobacco use insights2025

Formerly Smoking and Currently Smoking Cancer Survivors' View on Smoking Cessation - A Qualitative Study.

Frederike Bokemeyer, Johanna Springorum, Lisa Lebherz, Carsten Bokemeyer, Holger Schulz, Kathleen Gali, Christiane Bleich, Paulina Kiefer, Sven Püffel, Janina Freitag

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tobacco use insights, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Frederike BokemeyerDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6299-4088
Johanna SpringorumDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Lisa LebherzDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6681-5152
Carsten BokemeyerDepartment of Oncology, Hematology, BMT Plus Section Pneumology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Holger SchulzDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Kathleen GaliHamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.
Christiane BleichDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Paulina KieferHamburg Center for Health Economics, University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7343-4266
Sven PüffelFresenius University of Applied Sciences, Hamburg, Germany.
Janina FreitagDepartment of Medical Psychology, University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Drastic life events, such as a cancer diagnosis, do not necessarily lead to a reduction in unhealthy and dysfunctional behaviors like smoking. Continued smoking among cancer survivors significantly increases the risk of recurrence and worsens treatment outcomes. While evidence-based smoking cessation treatments have demonstrated their effectiveness in acute cancer care, their impact among long-term cancer survivors remains limited, and overall quit rates remain low. To cessation outcome and improve long-term support strategies, it is essential to better understand the experiences, attitudes, and perceived barriers of both current and former smoking cancer survivors. Materials and Methods: This qualitative study included semi-structured interviews with six cancer survivors (50% female), aged 34 to 81 years, with different cancer types (breast, skin, lung, urinary bladder cancer, and GIST). At the time of the interview, three participants were still smoking, two had quit at the time of their diagnosis, and one had quit beforehand. All had completed cancer treatment at least four years prior without relapse. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed using qualitative content analysis, applying an inductive approach to identify recurring themes and categorize the data using computer-assisted analysis software. Results: Four main categories emerged from the interviews: (1) motivations for quitting, (2) perceived barriers, (3) facilitators of cessation, and (4) contextual influences.Key motives for continued smoking after a cancer diagnosis included managing nicotine cravings and stress, experiencing pleasure and boredom relief, and a perceived lack of negative health consequences. Some participants reported smoking to cope with treatment-related discomfort. A general lack of knowledge regarding the link between smoking and cancer contributed to low motivation to quit and limited risk awareness. Participants who had successfully quit cited improvements in health and well-being as primary reasons for cessation, alongside external factors such as financial savings and the aversion to cigarette odor. Medical advice and support from healthcare providers were mentioned frequently - both as motivating factors and, in cases where such support was absent or discouraging, as barriers.Barriers to quitting included a persistent smoking environment, negative emotions during cessation attempts, poor timing related to the cancer experience, and previous failed quit attempts.Conversely, facilitators of cessation included external regulations (eg, smoking bans, legal restrictions), a tobacco-free environment, strong internal motivation, individual coping strategies for withdrawal symptoms and craving, medical recommendations, and support from family or peers. Discussion/Conclusion: The results highlight the need for a better adaptation of smoking cessation interventions to the specific needs of cancer survivors. This has significant implications for oncology professionals and healthcare providers in cancer care. The inconsistency in smoking cessation advice from healthcare providers, ranging from discouragement to strong encouragement, points to the necessity of re-evaluating current policies and establishing more standardized communication within oncology settings. Cancer survivors require improved education about the health risks associated with continued smoking, as well as information about available cessation aids and pharmacological support options. The "teachable moment" following a cancer diagnosis presents an opportunity to integrate smoking cessation support into routine oncological care. Practical strategies for cancer survivors who wish to quit include the development of alternative behaviors, effective stress management techniques, and further enhancement of legal restrictions to promote a smoke-free environment. Such measures would not only support individual cessation efforts but also contribute to broader public health goals, protecting cancer survivors and the general population from smoking-related harm. The insights from this study provide a foundation for the development of more tailored cessation interventions for cancer survivors.

Indexed as

cancerhealth service researchnicotinepsycho-oncologyqualitative researchsmoking cessationsmoking relapse

Identifiers

PMID41079388
PMCPMC12511738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.