ArticleAnnals of gastroenterology2025
Prospective analysis of outcomes in umbilical hernia repair for patients with decompensated cirrhosis.
Article in Annals of gastroenterology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Laparoscopic versus open repair for umbilical hernia: outcomes and complications.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Elective umbilical hernia repair (UHR) is recommended for symptomatic patients who have decompensated cirrhosis with ascites. However, the exact timing, the type of surgery, and the factors affecting the outcomes are not clearly defined. Methods: We prospectively collected data of patients with decompensated cirrhosis and ascites, who underwent UHR between January 2016 and July 2024. Complications and mortality were recorded during the early post-surgery period, at 30 days, at 3 months, and at 12 months after surgery. Our aim was to assess the short-term and long-term outcomes of decompensated cirrhotic patients who underwent either elective or emergency UHR. Results: We included 19 patients (15 male), median model for end-stage liver disease score 15 (interquartile range [IQR] 11-39), who underwent UHR (16 emergent, 3 elective). Median survival time at 12 months after UHR was 5.5 months (IQR 0.3-86), whereas the mortality rates at 12 months were up to 68.42% (13/19 patients). No association was found between survival and type of surgery, type of anesthesia, preoperative use of diuretics, ascites grade or laboratory findings. Survival rates at 30 days (P=0.086), 3 months (P=0.022), and 12 months (P=0.031) postoperatively were better in patients who underwent emergent UHR. Conclusions: UHR in decompensated cirrhotics is associated with high mortality. Several risk factors are implicated in the outcomes, with the severity of liver disease having a central role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.