Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079262›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of exercise science2025

Accelerations and EMG Differences Between Isocaloric High-Incline Walking and Level-Grade Jogging.

Taj Krieger, Motoki Sato, Lex Gidley, Justus Ortega, D E Lankford

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of exercise science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Taj KriegerDepartment of Kinesiology, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA, USA.
Motoki SatoDepartment of Kinesiology, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA, USA.
Lex GidleyDepartment of Sports Medicine, United States Olympic and Paralympic Committee, Colorado Springs, CO, USA.
Justus OrtegaDepartment of Kinesiology, California State Polytechnic University, Humboldt, Arcata, CA, USA.
D E LankfordDepartment of Kinesiology, California State University, Fresno, CA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-incline walking is a popular mode of exercise and often serves as an alternative to level-grade running for improving cardiovascular fitness. This study examined the muscle activation and biomechanical differences between high-incline walking (HIW) at a 20% grade and level-grade jogging (LGJ) at matched exercise intensities. Nineteen physically inactive adults (18-31 years) participated. Participants completed two isocaloric exercise trials (HIW and LGJ), each lasting ten minutes. EMG data were obtained from eight muscles: biceps femoris (BF), gluteus maximus (GM), lateral gastrocnemius (LG), tibialis anterior (TA), vastus lateralis (VL), anterior deltoid (AD), erector spinae (ES), and soleus (SOL). Resultant accelerations on the foot and sacrum were measured using inertial measurement units (IMUs). At matched isocaloric intensities between LGJ and HIW, mean peak resultant acceleration was significantly higher in LGJ for the foot (22.14 ± 8.44 m/s

Indexed as

Gaitlower limb accelerationslunge

Identifiers

PMID41079262
PMCPMC12510700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.