ReviewOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands)2025
Magnetic and electromagnetic methods in reducing microbial contamination in water: A systematic review and meta-analyses.
Review in One health (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent advancements in water disinfection methods have introduced magnetic and electromagnetic techniques as potential solutions. However, the efficacy of these methods remains inconsistent and necessitates thorough evaluation. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of magnetic and electromagnetic methods in reducing microbial contamination in water by synthesizing findings from relevant studies. A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple electronic databases, including Web of Science, PubMed, and Scopus, to identify studies published between January 2010 and March 2025. Data extracted from eligible studies were analyzed using meta-analytical techniques to determine overall effectiveness, with heterogeneity assessed through effect sizes. The results revealed mixed efficacy for magnetic and electromagnetic methods in water disinfection. While several studies reported negative effect sizes, including a notable negative effect size of -0.8 (CI: -1.2, -0.4), others demonstrated positive effects, with an effect size of 0.7 (CI: 0.2, 1.2) indicating significant improvements in disinfection efficacy. The findings demonstrated that magnetic and electromagnetic methods can be valuable tools for microbial control in water treatment. Moreover, magnetic and pulsed fields indicated potential for environmental remediation and enhancing antimicrobial efficacy. However, the observed increase in microbial populations following exposure to magnetic fields proposes the necessity for optimized conditions to prevent unintended microbial proliferation. This study emphasized the importance of integrating innovative disinfection methods into comprehensive water management strategies that aligns with One Health principles, ultimately supporting healthier ecosystems and communities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.