Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Personalized prediction of pathological complete response in breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy: a nomogram combining quantitative MRI biomarkers and molecular subtypes.

Zhendong Shi, Xiaoxing Bian, Hanyan Zhu, Chunyan Li, Jie Meng, Xiaomin Qian, Peng Zhou, Jin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhendong Shi *The Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Xiaoxing Bian *The Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Hanyan ZhuThe Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Chunyan LiThe Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Jie MengThe Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Xiaomin QianDepartment of Medical Laboratory, School of Medical Technology, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China.
Peng ZhouThe Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Jin ZhangThe Third Department of Breast Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, we aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of MRI in assessing neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) response, investigate determinants of its accuracy, and develop a nomogram for predicting pathological complete response (pCR) following NAT. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 554 female patients who received NAT between January 2019 and December 2022 and underwent MRI scans pre- and post-treatment. Clinicopathological and MRI characteristics were collected. Univariable logistic regression identified predictors of diagnostic accuracy. Patients were then randomly allocated to training (n=388, 70%) and validation (n=166, 30%) cohorts. Using multivariable logistic regression in the training cohort, we identified independent predictors of pCR and constructed a predictive nomogram. Model performance was assessed in both cohorts using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), and goodness-of-fit tests. Results: The overall accuracy of breast MRI in evaluating NAT response was 77.44%. Multivariable analysis identified three factors independently associated with reduced MRI accuracy: ER-negative status, absence of ductal carcinoma Conclusion: Breast MRI accuracy was reduced in ER-negative tumors, those lacking DCIS, and lesions exhibiting coexistent mass and NME. A clinicopathological-MRI integrated nomogram demonstrated robust predictive performance for pCR after NAT completion, potentially aiding in surgical strategy planning.

Indexed as

breast cancermagnetic resonance imagingneoadjuvant therapynomogrampathological complete response

Identifiers

PMID41079107
PMCPMC12507605

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.