Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079090›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Time and cost burden associated with docetaxel in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer initiating an androgen receptor pathway inhibitor-based regimen.

Daniel Sentana-Lledo, Arjun Gupta, Carmine Rossi, Sabree Burbage, Jill Korsiak, Lilian Diaz, Gordon Wong, Dominic Pilon, Ibrahim Khilfeh, Alicia K Morgans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Time toxicity in cancer care: a systematic review of definitions and measurement methods.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel Sentana-LledoDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.
Arjun GuptaUniversity of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States.
Carmine RossiAnalysis Group, Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada.
Sabree BurbageJohnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, United States.
Jill KorsiakAnalysis Group, Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada.
Lilian DiazAnalysis Group, Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada.
Gordon WongAnalysis Group, Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada.
Dominic PilonAnalysis Group, Inc., Montréal, QC, Canada.
Ibrahim KhilfehJohnson & Johnson, Horsham, PA, United States.
Alicia K MorgansDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The triplet combination of chemotherapy (docetaxel), androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI), and androgen deprivation therapy has recently become a recommended approach to treat metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC). This study aimed to compare the incremental time and cost burden of adding docetaxel to ARPI-based treatment among patients with mCSPC receiving chemotherapy-containing regimens (CCR) and non-chemotherapy-containing regimens (NCR) in the United States. Methods: Clinical data from community urology practices linked with claims data (1/1/2016-12/31/2023) were used to select patients initiating a CCR or NCR. Outcomes, including time spent managing mCSPC (days with prostate cancer-related resource utilization or management care) and healthcare costs, were compared between balanced cohorts using weighted multivariable Poisson and linear regressions. Results: 126 CCR and 837 NCR patients (mean age 64.7 years, 52.6% White, 14.4% Black) were followed for a mean of 6.3 (CCR) and 6.8 (NCR) months. The CCR cohort spent on average 4.1 days per-patient-per-month (PPPM) managing mCSPC vs 3.3 days PPPM in the NCR cohort (rate ratio: 1.18; 95% confidence interval [CI]; 1.03, 1.34). Mean all-cause total healthcare costs were $17,833 PPPM in the CCR cohort and $11,527 PPPM in the NCR cohort (weighted adjusted cost difference: $6,184; 95% CI: 3,515, 8,517). Conclusions: Patients initiating a CCR experienced greater time burden managing mCSPC and higher healthcare costs than those initiating an NCR. These findings support counseling expressing these differences in burden in mCSPC treatment decision-making conversations.

Indexed as

androgen receptor antagonistschemotherapyhormone receptor agonistsmCSPCprostate neoplasmstime burdentriplet therapy

Identifiers

PMID41079090
PMCPMC12512215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.