Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079089›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Machine learning-based radiomics for bladder cancer staging: evaluating the role of imaging timing in differentiating T2 from T3 disease.

Christoph G Lisson, Luisa Gallee, Konstantin Müller, Sabitha Manoj, Hannah Stöckl, Friedemann Zengerling, Christian Bolenz, Meinrad Beer, Michael Götz, Catharina S Lisson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christoph G Lisson *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Luisa Gallee *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Konstantin MüllerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Sabitha ManojDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Hannah StöcklDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Friedemann ZengerlingDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Christian BolenzDepartment of Urology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Meinrad BeerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Michael GötzDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Catharina S LissonDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Accurate preoperative staging of bladder cancer is essential for therapeutic decision-making, particularly in distinguishing between organ-confined (T2) and extravesical (T3) disease. This study aimed to develop a CT-based radiomics model to differentiate T2 from T3 tumors and to evaluate the impact of imaging timing relative to transurethral resection of the bladder (TURB) on model performance. Additionally, we assessed the added diagnostic value of integrating routine clinical biomarkers. Methods: In this retrospective study, 97 patients with histologically confirmed bladder cancer who underwent TURB followed by contrast-enhanced CT were included. Tumor segmentation was performed using a semi-automated three-dimensional approach, and radiomic features were extracted according to IBSI standards. A random forest classifier was trained to distinguish between T2 and T3 tumors. Patients were stratified according to the interval between TURB and CT imaging (≤14 days vs >14 days). Performance metrics were assessed for both radiomics-only and combined clinical-radiomics models. Clinical variables included preoperative creatinine, hemoglobin, arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status, and tumor size. Results: The radiomics-only model achieved an AUC of 0.68 in Cohort 1 (≤14 days post-TURB). In Cohort 2 (>14 days post-TURB), model performance improved with an AUC of 0.80. The combined clinical-radiomics model further enhanced performance, yielding an AUC of 0.76 in Cohort 1 and 0.82 in Cohort 2. Delayed imaging was associated with increased radiomic feature stability and improved classification accuracy, suggesting a potential benefit of temporal separation from post-surgical tissue changes. Conclusion: This study demonstrates the feasibility of CT-based radiomics using full-volume 3D tumor segmentation to distinguish between T2 and T3 bladder cancer. The integration of clinical biomarkers and consideration of imaging timing significantly improved model performance. These findings support the development of temporally optimized, multimodal prediction models for individualized bladder cancer staging and treatment planning.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebladder cancercomputed tomographyimage-based biomarkersmachine learningradiomicstumor staging

Identifiers

PMID41079089
PMCPMC12512170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.