Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41079025›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025

Global transmission characteristics of mpox outbreaks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Shunzhe Wu, Jie Deng, Min Du, Min Liu, Jue Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Peri-Umbilicated Pseudopustules in Mpox.Oxford medical case reports · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shunzhe WuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jie DengDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Min DuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Min LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.
Jue LiuDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Peking University, No. 38, Xueyuan Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100191, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mpox is a zoonotic infectious disease caused by the mpox virus. It was first reported in humans in the Democratic Republic of the Congo in 1970. Since then, it has mainly been prevalent in Central and West Africa. Starting from 2022, the mpox epidemic has spread globally. The objective of this study was to obtain key transmission parameters of the mpox virus, providing evidence-based support for scientific prevention and control of the epidemic worldwide. Methods: We used "mpox" and "monkeypox" as the keywords to retrieve studies from PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to February 2025. Four key transmission parameters-basic reproduction number (R0), effective reproduction number (Rt), incubation period, and serial interval were extracted. Fixed-effect or random-effect models were used to estimate the pooled parameters. Hartung-Knapp (HKSJ) confidence intervals was reported to reflect uncertainty under high heterogeneity. The protocol of this study has been registered in the PROSPERO database (CRD42022339404). Findings: The study screened 2910 articles and included 47 articles (covering 43,387 mpox patients) based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. The R0 of mpox was 2.13 (95% CI [HKSJ]: 1.63, 2.62), the Rt of mpox was 2.51 (95% CI [HKSJ]: 2.05, 2.97), the incubation period of mpox was 9.21 (95% CI [HKSJ]: 8.03, 10.39) days, and the serial interval of mpox was 12.00 (95% CI [HKSJ]: 8.01, 15.99) days. Subgroup analysis found no significant differences in incubation period, and serial interval between men who have sex with men (MSM) and the general population. However, the Rt in the general population (2.20, 95% CI [HKSJ]: 1.71, 2.70) was smaller than the Rt in the MSM (3.08, 95% CI [HKSJ]: 2.41, 3.76). Interpretation: Mpox is a threat to global public health that cannot be ignored. This study found that each person infected with the mpox virus transmitted it to two others, and the epidemic has continued to spread. Both the incubation period and the serial interval exceeded one week, which is relatively long and has increased the difficulty of prevention and control. It is recommended that in the future, early monitoring and early warning be strengthened for high-risk populations to prevent the risk of mpox transmission. Funding: This study was funded by the Youth Beijing Scholars Program (087), National Natural Science Foundation of China (72474005, 72122001), and China Primary Health Care Foundation (20250307). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the paper. No payment was received by any of the co-authors for the preparation of this article.

Indexed as

EpidemiologyMeta-analysisMpoxSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41079025
PMCPMC12508583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.