ReviewNature and science of sleep2025
Advances in Machine Learning Prediction Models for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults.
Review in Nature and science of sleep, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Explainable Machine-Learning Model for Predicting Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients Undergoing Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.Obesity surgery · 2026Article
- Exploring the Role of Nocturnal Hypoxemia and Sleep Fragmentation in Memory Decline: Insights From Explainable Machine Learning Models.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
- A Nomogram Model for Predicting Moderate to Severe OSA in Western China: A Retrospective Analysis.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a global health problem. Patients with OSA may experience the upper airway collapsing during sleep, resulting in decreased oxygen saturation and sleep disruption, which is characterized by hypoxemia and sleep fragmentation, thereby reducing sleep quality and harming quality of life. In addition, OSA is associated with the occurrence of a variety of systemic diseases, which brings a huge burden to public health. Therefore, timely diagnosis of OSA is crucial. Polysomnography (PSG) is the most accurate method for diagnosing OSA at present, which can be used to determine the severity of sleep apnea and to monitor therapeutic efficacy. However, the PSG is difficult to be popularized because of its cumbersome operation, patients' non-compliance, and expensive medical expenses. Therefore, it is imperative to find a convenient and fast OSA diagnosis method. In recent years, the development of machine learning prediction models and their application in the medical field have provided a new method for OSA severity diagnosis, making it possible to identify OSA severities efficiently and accurately. The purpose of this paper is to review relevant research on machine learning prediction models for OSA severity diagnosis and to provide sleep specialists with recommendations for more effective early identification and diagnosis of OSA. In addition, the challenges faced by machine learning at the level of diagnostic applications are summarized and future trends are envisioned.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.