Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078961›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2025

Multiomic random forest toxicity modeling of radiation esophagitis.

Saurabh S Nair, Ramon M Salazar, Ting Xu, Alexandra O Leone, Zhongxing Liao, Laurence E Court, Joshua S Niedzielski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Saurabh S NairDepartments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ramon M SalazarDepartments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Ting XuThoaracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Alexandra O LeoneDepartments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Zhongxing LiaoThoaracic Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Laurence E CourtDepartments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Joshua S NiedzielskiDepartments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: Radiation esophagitis (RE) is a major dose-limiting toxicity resulting from radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Multiomic features may provide additional predictive value for high-grade RE compared to traditionally used clinical and dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters. We aimed to investigate the utility of multiomic features in improving RE toxicity prediction models. Materials and methods: Of the 179 NSCLC patients considered, 27 patients (15.08 %) were found to have toxicity ≥grade 3 RE per CTCAE v5.0. A total of 343 CT- and PET- based radiomic and dosiomic features were extracted. Four toxicity prediction models were created using clinical factors and features from one of the following groups: (a) base model (DVH), (b) radiomic, (c) dosiomic, and (d) combined radiomic and dosiomic. Models were developed using a random forest classifier with 100 Monte Carlo cross-validation iterations and an 80 %/20 % training/test split. Model predictive performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC). Results: The AUC and AUPRC values (mean ± standard deviation) for the 4 model types were 0.69 ± 0.10/0.42 ± 0.12 (base model), 0.71 ± 0.12/0.48 ± 0.13 (radiomic), 0.73 ± 0.10/0.48 ± 0.15 (dosiomic), and 0.75 ± 0.10/0.49 ± 0.14 (radiomic and dosiomic), respectively. The bootstrap percentile method, which was used to compare performance metrics between multiomic and base models, showed that the combined model was the best performing model type. Conclusion: All multiomic models outperformed the base model. The combined radiomic-dosiomic model provides novel insights into high-grade RE risk and may inform future strategies for toxicity mitigation and personalized treatment planning.

Indexed as

Machine learningNon small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Outcome prediction modelingRadiation esophagitisRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID41078961
PMCPMC12512973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.