Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078888›Full record

ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025

Perioperative Care of Free Flap Patients: A Scoping Review of Current Evidence.

Sebastien P Lalonde, Aaron M Voshage

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sebastien P LalondeFrom the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.
Aaron M VoshageDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Failure of a free flap can occur unpredictably with devastating consequences for the patient. Microvascular surgeons have developed perioperative protocols designed to mitigate the risk of flap failure. Such protocols are highly variable and generally lack consensus. This review aimed to provide the microsurgeon with a current map of the evidence in key aspects of the perioperative care of free flap patients, which can be used to inform clinical decision-making. Methods: A multidatabase scoping review was conducted to identify free flap articles. The articles were then reviewed to determine if they met inclusion criteria. Included articles were then critically appraised and assigned a corresponding level of evidence in accordance with the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Evidence-based Practice Committee. Results: A total of 104 studies of varying quality were included in this review, from which evidence data were extracted and grouped into categories of perioperative free flap care. Conclusions: Despite existing literature, current practice is largely informed by expert opinion instead of evidence-based data. Interventions supported by evidence include delaying flap surgery to optimize patient factors and obtaining baseline blood work. Avoidance of perioperative hypothermia is indicated, but no evidence exists for supplemental postoperative warming. Restrictive protocols for blood transfusions are likely safe. The literature supported clinical monitoring of unburied flaps, but the optimal schedule and duration were unknown. There is evidence to support the use of gabapentin to improve postoperative pain and decrease opioid use. In lower extremity free flaps, allowing early leg dangling is likely safe.

Identifiers

PMID41078888
PMCPMC12510157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.