ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Primary Nipple-Repositioning Surgery Before Nipple-sparing Mastectomy in Large or Ptotic Breasts: A Multicenter Cohort Analysis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Outcomes After Mastectomy With vs Without Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study of 5160 Patients.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) after nipple-repositioning surgery (mastopexy or breast reduction) is increasingly used in patients with large or ptotic breasts to improve vascularity to the nipple-areolar complex (NAC) and decrease the risk of necrosis. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the safety and optimal timing of this approach. Methods: Preferred reporting items of systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines were followed. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched on February 24, 2024. All observational studies reporting complication outcomes and/or timing between staged NSM after breast reduction or mastopexy were included. Results: Thirteen studies met the inclusion criteria, with a combined sample of 591 breasts. The incidence of partial and complete NAC necrosis across the 13 studies was 4.06% (24 of 591), whereas skin flap necrosis occurred in 15 out of 591 breasts (2.54%), as reported in 8 studies. The mean follow-up time was 436.35 days, and the mean interval between mastopexy and NSM was 288.2 days. A correlation was observed between longer intervals and lower rates of skin flap necrosis and NAC necrosis; subgroup analysis for intervals greater than 5 months showed only 1 case of complete NAC necrosis across the combined sample of all studies. Conclusions: Although data suggest that a 4- to 6-month interval may minimize complications, further research with larger sample sizes, longer follow-up times, and randomized controlled trials comparing staged and nonstaged approaches is necessary to establish definitive guidelines, especially with regard to high-risk patients requiring radiotherapy or undergoing therapeutic rather than prophylactic NSM.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.