ArticleBioactive materials2026
Cell-instructive microfibers enable programmable alignment of bioprinted hMSC.
Article in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Fiber-integrated hydrogels: a versatile platform to improve structural and biological performance in 3D biofabrication.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biofabrication of hierarchical tissues with features ranging various size ranges and controllable anisotropy remains a challenge in 3D-bioprinting. To overcome this hurdle, the application of multi-functional microfibers acting as cell-instructive bioink additive, recently gained particular attention. In this work, we investigate a microfluidic spinning process for the fabrication of collagen microfibers with adjustable diameters ranging from 5 to 50 μm. The thread was collected on a rotating winder and fragmented into microfibers of defined length (60-300 μm). By integrating microfiber fragments into an agarose-hyaluronan hydrogel, fine-tuning of its viscosity range (10-1000 mPa∗s), and thus the precise control of the extruded strands' diameter (0.3-1.4 mm) was achieved. While remaining strong shear-thinning behavior (n-value 0.6), E-modulus and yield stress were decreased in fiber-filled hydrogel, hinting at an interaction of agarose polymer chains with microfibers. Remarkably, the orientation of collagen microfibers could be directed either parallel or orthogonal to the printing path. This allows the biofabrication of hydrogel structures with adjustable domains of defined anisotropy. Finally, the fibers showed excellent biofunctionality both in 2D and 3D. Besides a high degree of alignment of individual cells along the microfiber axis (>80 % of cells), hMSCs built a dense, branched network in 3D. Moreover, PC12 and C2C12 were successfully differentiated in 2D and 3D. Specifically, neurite length was higher on smaller fiber diameters, even spanning non-adjacent clusters. Elongated, multi-nuclei myotubes were formed, indicating C2C12 differentiation. In summary, the work demonstrates the great potential of 3D-bioprinting in cross-scale organization of fragmented collagen microfibers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.