ArticleBioactive materials2026
Mn
Article in Bioactive materials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bone defect repair materials after bone tumour resection: from structural substitutes to biofunctionalized synergistic therapy.Annals of medicine · 2026Review
- A stalactite-inspired NIR/pH-responsive visualizable nano-platform for microenvironment-activated therapy of peri-implantitis-induced bone defects.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- Enhancing Bone Repair Process: Application and Perspective on Photothermal Materials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- High-performance hydrogels in orthopedics: Structural design, performance tuning, and clinical potential.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Smart Stimulus-Responsive Hydrogels for Precision Drug Delivery in Tumours.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Sequential polarization of macrophages: an immunomodulatory strategy for novel bone repair materials.Regenerative biomaterials · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Postoperative bone reconstruction after tumor resection remains challenging due to tumor recurrence and poor osteogenesis. Although photothermal scaffolds can ablate tumors (via high heat) and stimulate bone formation (via mild heat), balancing these effects is difficult-excessive heat damages tissue, while insufficient heat fails to eliminate tumors. Here, we develop an injectable Mn
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.