ReviewMethodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal2025
Robotic-Assisted Vascular Surgery: A Clinical Perspective.
Review in Methodist DeBakey cardiovascular journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bibliometric and knowledge-map analysis of research on robot-assisted vascular interventional surgery (2015-2025).Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Case Series: Single-port subxiphoid robotic excision of ectopic mediastinal parathyroid adenomas.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This literature review provides a comprehensive clinical perspective on the current and potential role of robotic-assisted surgery within vascular practice. It outlines the historical development and technical components of surgical robotic platforms, particularly the da Vinci system, and reviews published evidence on robotic-assisted vascular procedures. It also examines the advantages and limitations of robotic approaches compared to open and endovascular techniques, the current absence of dedicated robotic tools for vascular use, and the growing need for structured training pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.