ReviewNational science review2025
Recent progress in nickelate superconductors.
Review in National science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-temperature superconductivity at 100K in LaNature communications · 2026Article
- Superconductivity onset above 60 K in ambient-pressure nickelate films.National science review · 2026Article
- Article
- Tracing the horizon of tetragonal-to-monoclinic distortion in pressurized trilayer nickelate LaCommunications materials · 2026Article
- Article
- The preface: Nickelates-a new playground for high-National science review · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The discovery of superconductivity in nickelate compounds has opened new avenues in the study of high-temperature superconductors. Here we provide a comprehensive overview of recent progress in the field, covering various nickelate systems, including the reduced-Ruddlesden-Popper-type infinite layer LaNiO[Formula: see text] as well as the Ruddlesden-Popper-type bilayer La[Formula: see text]Ni[Formula: see text]O[Formula: see text] and trilayer La[Formula: see text]Ni[Formula: see text]O[Formula: see text]. We begin by introducing the superconducting properties of the hole-doped LaNiO[Formula: see text] system, which marked the starting point for nickelate superconductivity. We then turn to the bilayer La[Formula: see text]Ni[Formula: see text]O[Formula: see text] system, discussing both its high-pressure and thin-film superconducting phases. This is followed by an examination of the trilayer La[Formula: see text]Ni[Formula: see text]O[Formula: see text] system and other related multilayer nickelates. Throughout the review, we highlight emerging trends, key challenges and open questions. We conclude by addressing current limitations in materials synthesis and characterization, and future directions that may help uncover the mechanisms driving superconductivity in these complex oxide systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.