Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078719›Full record

ArticleSurgery in practice and science2025

Perceptions, practices, and barriers in surgical informed consent: A cross-sectional study from Sudan: Surgical Informed Consent in Sudan.

Ibrahim Nagmeldin Hassan, Mohamed Ibrahim, Siddig Yaqub, Muhsin Ibrahim, Haythem Abdalla, Ghada Aljaili, Wafa Osman, Nagmeldin Abuassa

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgery in practice and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ibrahim Nagmeldin HassanUniversity of Khartoum Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Mohamed IbrahimAl-Neelain University Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Siddig YaqubKarary University, Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Muhsin IbrahimSudan University of Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Haythem AbdallaUniversity of Bahri, Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Ghada AljailiOmdurman Islamic University, Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Wafa OsmanUniversity of Bahri, Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.
Nagmeldin AbuassaUniversity of Khartoum Faculty of Medicine, Khartoum, Sudan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Informed consent is a cornerstone of ethical surgical practice, yet significant challenges persist in ensuring patients' comprehension, particularly in low-resource settings. Cultural norms, literacy barriers, and limited institutional support often hinder truly informed decision-making. Methods: A hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted from September to December 2024 at a rural surgical center in Omdurman, Sudan. A total of 422 adult patients undergoing elective surgery were interviewed postoperatively using a validated, culturally adapted questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied to assess patient demographics, perceptions of the informed consent process, and associated barriers. Results: The mean age of participants was 42.0 ± 14.3 years, with a near-equal gender distribution. Only 17.1% of patients signed their own surgical consent forms, with 80.6% of these self-signers being male. Among those whose consent was signed by relatives (82.9%), females were overrepresented (56.6%). While 91.5% recognized the importance of informed consent, only 33.6% understood its medico-legal significance. Consent explanations were predominantly delivered by residents or house officers (62.1%), and just 20.1% of patients felt that the discussion influenced their surgical decision. Self-signers were more likely to recall discussion of surgical complications (75.0% vs. 51.4%; Conclusion: Despite high reported satisfaction, substantial deficiencies exist in patients' comprehension and autonomy in the informed consent process in Sudan. Gender disparities, literacy limitations, and systemic reliance on junior staff compromise the ethical validity of consent. Interventions tailored to cultural and educational contexts-such as provider training, simplified materials, and patient-centered communication-are urgently needed to enhance informed surgical decision-making in low-resource environments.

Indexed as

Health literacyInformed consentMedical ethicsPatient comprehensionSudanSurgical patients

Identifiers

PMID41078719
PMCPMC12508847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.