ArticleOncology letters2025
Transarterial infusion chemotherapy for severe hepatic dysfunction and poor performance status in diffuse hepatic metastasis: A case report.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Severe hepatic dysfunction and high performance status (PS) scores in patients with cancer often indicate a poor prognosis, with an estimated survival time of <3 months, making them typically candidates for palliative care. The current study presents the case of a 66-year-old male patient with prostate neuroendocrine carcinoma and diffuse hepatic metastasis, accompanied by severe hepatic dysfunction (Child-Pugh C10) and poor PS (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group PS3). The patient was treated with transarterial infusion chemotherapy (TAI) using a reduced-dose etoposide and cisplatin regimen. After six cycles, significant tumor regression occurred. According to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1 criteria, the response was a partial response. The patient finally succumbed, achieving a progression-free survival time of 11.05 months and an overall survival time of 18.87 months. This case indicates that, for patients with sensitive and aggressive tumors (such as prostate neuroendocrine carcinoma) who have hepatic metastasis-induced severe hepatic dysfunction and poor PS, local reduced-dose TAI therapy may be a viable option to overcome traditional treatment contraindications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.