ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Failed Primary Fixation of Monteggia Fractures - A Case Series.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Introduction: Missed lesions, myositis, nerve palsies, and compartment syndrome are the listed complications of Monteggia fracture dislocations. There is a lot of literature on missed or neglected Monteggia fractures, but we could not find any series or studies on how to tackle failed primary fixations. We report the first case series of analysis and management of failed fixation of Monteggia fractures. Materials and Methods: In this case series, we discuss four cases that were identified as failure of fixation of the Monteggia fracture dislocation. Three children, 6-year-old female child, 7-year-old male child, 6-year-old male child, and one adult male of 39 years of age were operated on with open or closed reductions of the forearm fractures with rigid or flexible fixation. Two of these patients presented with Bado Type I, one with Type I equivalent and one Type IV fracture. In all the cases, the surgeon had correctly diagnosed the Monteggia fracture but was unable to reduce and fix it properly. We discuss the technical reasons for failure and the process by which they were corrected. After the revision surgery, the anatomy was restored in all the patients and the functional outcome was satisfactory. Conclusion: Based on these cases, the authors conclude that a thorough clinical evaluation, careful pre-operative assessment of potential failure factors, and meticulous surgical planning are essential to reduce the risk of revision surgeries and prevent further complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.