ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Do Spino-pelvic Parameters Predict Development of Spondylolisthesis in Degenerative Disc Disease at the L4-5 Level.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: The natural history of degenerative disc disease (DDD) has been the subject of intense study over the last several decades. Although many authors have observed that the degenerated motion segment undergoes progressive reduction of mobility in all directions, in some instances, the degeneration progresses to a sagittal plane segmental displacement (degenerative listhesis).The aim of the study is to compare the spinopelvic parameters (SPPs) between patients with degenerated disc but no listhesis versus those who have a degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSL). We also attempt to statistically correlate and thereby predict which patients are likely to progress to DSL. Materials and Methods: Between September 2021 and August 2024, 63 patients with a single-level degenerative pathology at L4-5 level were divided into DSL and non-listhesis group. Their SPPs, namely pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), disc angle, and position of L5 were studied on standing lumbosacral spine X-ray. The variables were compared between groups, receiver operator characteristic and cut-off points were calculated, and a multiple logistic regression was performed. Results: 52 patients were available for final analysis. DSL groups had higher PI and PT as well as lower disc angle in comparison to non-listhetic patients. A PI of >48.8°, PT of > 16.75°, and a disc angle of >-8.05° (implying a more kyphotic segment) were deemed threshold values for predicting DSL. The logistic regression yielded an adjusted odds ratio of 1.127 (PI) and 1.299 (disc angle), respectively. Conclusion: High PI with pelvic retroflexion and normal LL seem to be the prerequisites for DSL developing at a degenerative disc at the L4-5 level. Thus, Roussouly Type 3 Spino-pelvic alignment individuals seem most predisposed to develop DSL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.