ArticleJournal of orthopaedic case reports2025
Burden, Treatment Patterns, and Functional Recovery of Hand Injuries in a Tertiary Hospital of Eastern India.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic case reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This retrospective observational study was conducted to emphasize on epidemiological demographics and management of patients presenting with acute hand injuries to the Plastic Surgery and Emergency department and study the functional outcome of such injuries post-intervention. Materials and Methods: The present observational study was conducted on 118 patients who had presented with hand injuries from July 2020 to December 2021 with the objectives to determine their demographic characteristics, their severity using hand injury severity scoring system. Functional outcome assessment was done using two-point discrimination for the sensory, while Purdue Pegboard Test and Jebsen-Taylor hand function test were used for the motor assessment of these patients. Results: In the present study, males were more affected than females (M: F = 5.5:1), with the majority of the patients sustained multiple injuries involving different components of the hand in 38.1% patients, and with the most common mode of injury being machine cut injuries in 40.7% patients (P < 0.049). Conclusion: Since it was a prospective study, there was a major correlation between the gender and mode of injury, especially males getting more affected than females. The severity of hand injury showed a significant association with the functional outcome of the hand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.