ArticleDigital health
Attitudes of mHealth end-users toward integrating mobile technology in HIV program monitoring in Cameroon.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: HIV/AIDS is a major public health issue in Cameroon. Traditional paper-based monitoring systems often fail to provide timely and accurate data, essential for effective program management. The increasing availability of mobile phones and internet services presents an opportunity for mHealth technologies to improve data collection and monitoring. However, the successful integration of mHealth into existing systems requires an understanding of the attitudes and challenges faced by end-users. This study explores the attitudes of mHealth end-users and the challenges they face in integrating mobile technology into HIV program monitoring in Cameroon. Methods: A mixed-methods approach was employed, involving both qualitative and quantitative data collection. The study included 251 respondents from 4 regions (East, Adamawa, Centre, and Littoral) and 4 FGDs. Data were collected using questionnaires and focus group discussion guides. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS, while qualitative data were transcribed and analyzed using Nvivo9 with an inductive thematic approach. Results: The quantitative analysis revealed that 78% of respondents had a good attitude toward mHealth, with a mean score of 4.48 ± 0.956. A significant difference was found in the mean attitude scores between those categorized as having good (M = 4.94, SD = 0.244) and poor attitudes (M = 2.71, SD = 0.540; t = -42.50, df = 237, p < 0.001). Qualitative findings supported these results, with most FGD participants expressing a preference for mobile applications over traditional methods due to ease of use and efficiency. Factors such as region of work (F = 5.259, p = 0.002) and educational level (F = 13.45, p < 0.001) significantly influenced attitudes toward mHealth, while age and work experience did not show significant associations. Key challenges identified include the need for better training and support for mHealth technologies, issues with the reliability of mobile devices, and the need for integration with existing systems. Conclusion: There is strong support for the use of mobile technology in improving data collection and patient care. There is a generally positive attitude toward mHealth among end-users in Cameroon, with significant support for its continued integration into HIV program monitoring. However, challenges such as device usability and internet access need to be addressed to enhance the effectiveness of mHealth interventions. Future initiatives should consider these factors to improve data collection and program monitoring in Cameroon.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.