ArticleFrontiers in global women's health2025
Engaging communities, modeling systems: lessons from system dynamics modeling on maternal health in Texas.
Article in Frontiers in global women's health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the use of participatory system dynamics group model building for expanding systems thinking capacity among community-based stakeholders.Journal of prevention & intervention in the community · 2026Article
- Patients as Partners in Perinatal Health Research: A Scoping Review.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Disparate maternal health outcomes among non-Hispanic Black women stem from intricate, interrelated factors shaped by clinical, social, and structural influences. Traditional approaches often fall short in addressing these complexities, necessitating a shift toward systems thinking and community-driven solutions. Methods and materials: This paper describes the lessons learned from the implementation of system dynamics group model building (SD GMB) workshops grounded in community-based participatory research (CBPR) principles in two separate projects focused on maternal health among Black women. We recruited 31 diverse stakeholders, including individuals with lived experience, and applied trauma-informed facilitation, wraparound support, and structured systems modeling activities. A descriptive analysis of workshop data was performed to accompany the identified lessons learned. Results: Evaluation data from surveys and open-ended responses indicated high stakeholder satisfaction, increased capacity to apply systems thinking, and a shift from skepticism to agency. Stakeholders valued the inclusive design, reported meaningful learning, and expressed interest in future engagement. The workshops fostered transformative learning and generated actionable systems insights rooted in community experience. Discussion: This work demonstrates how SD GMB, when integrated with CBPR, can build trust, elevate marginalized voices, and produce models that reflect structural realities. Future directions include quantifying the models, hosting learning labs to test interventions, and developing an open-access dashboard to simulate policy scenarios. These findings contribute to ongoing efforts to design more engaging, community-informed approaches to maternal health research and practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.