Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078580›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2025

Two B or not two B; the question of bendamustine dosing in low grade lymphoma.

Eszter Földi, Ádám Wiedemann, Szabolcs Svorenj, Virág Réka Szita, András Dávid Tóth, Ilona Tárkányi, Ágnes Fehér, Ágnes Kárpáti, Laura Horváth, Gergely Szombath and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Eszter FöldiFaculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ádám WiedemannDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Szabolcs SvorenjDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Virág Réka SzitaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
András Dávid TóthDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ilona TárkányiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágnes FehérDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ágnes KárpátiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Laura HorváthDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gergely SzombathDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt NagyDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Imre BodóDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Péter FarkasDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Tamás MassziDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Gergely VargaDepartment of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent yet incurable B-cell lymphoma subtype commonly treated with a combination of bendamustine and anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab. While the standard administration involves a 2-day dosing schedule, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted the exploration of a 1-day regimen to reduce hospital visits for immunocompromised patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 1-day versus 2-day bendamustine regimens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 144 patients with FL, marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, or Waldenström macroglobulinemia treated at the Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University between 2015 and 2023. All patients received bendamustine combined with either rituximab or obinutuzumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and appropriate statistical tests were applied. Results: The median PFS for the cohort was 69.47 months; OS was not reached. Despite receiving a significantly lower cumulative dose, and being significantly older, patients on the 1-day regimen had similar PFS (not reached vs. 69.47 months; p = 0.885) and no significant difference in OS (p = 0.147) compared to the 2-day group. Adverse events were more frequent in the 2-day regimen group, including severe side effects, such as neutropenia (p = 0.044). Conclusion: A 1-day bendamustine regimen may offer comparable efficacy to the standard 2-day schedule, with a potentially more favorable toxicity profile and better convenience, especially in older or more vulnerable patient populations. These findings warrant further investigation in prospective randomized trials to establish optimal dosing strategies.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBendamustine HydrochlorideLymphoma, FollicularAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRituximabSurvival RateAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Agents, AlkylatingBendamustine HydrochlorideobinutuzumabRituximabbendamustinefollicular lymphomalow grade lymphomarituximabschedule

Identifiers

PMID41078580
PMCPMC12507707

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.