ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2025
Two B or not two B; the question of bendamustine dosing in low grade lymphoma.
Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) is an indolent yet incurable B-cell lymphoma subtype commonly treated with a combination of bendamustine and anti-CD20 antibodies such as rituximab. While the standard administration involves a 2-day dosing schedule, the COVID-19 pandemic prompted the exploration of a 1-day regimen to reduce hospital visits for immunocompromised patients. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of 1-day versus 2-day bendamustine regimens. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 144 patients with FL, marginal zone lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, or Waldenström macroglobulinemia treated at the Department of Internal Medicine and Hematology, Semmelweis University between 2015 and 2023. All patients received bendamustine combined with either rituximab or obinutuzumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and appropriate statistical tests were applied. Results: The median PFS for the cohort was 69.47 months; OS was not reached. Despite receiving a significantly lower cumulative dose, and being significantly older, patients on the 1-day regimen had similar PFS (not reached vs. 69.47 months; p = 0.885) and no significant difference in OS (p = 0.147) compared to the 2-day group. Adverse events were more frequent in the 2-day regimen group, including severe side effects, such as neutropenia (p = 0.044). Conclusion: A 1-day bendamustine regimen may offer comparable efficacy to the standard 2-day schedule, with a potentially more favorable toxicity profile and better convenience, especially in older or more vulnerable patient populations. These findings warrant further investigation in prospective randomized trials to establish optimal dosing strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.