Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41078570›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2025

Artificial intelligence in osteoarthritis research: summary of the 2025 OARSI pre-congress workshop.

Matthew S Harkey, Kerry E Costello, Bella Mehta, Chunyi Wen, Anne-Marie Malfait, Henning Madry, Brooke Patterson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Matthew S HarkeyDepartment of Kinesiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing MI, USA.
Kerry E CostelloDepartment of Mechanical & Aerospace Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville FL, USA.
Bella MehtaWeill Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York NY, USA.
Chunyi WenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.
Anne-Marie MalfaitDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago IL, USA.
Henning MadryCenter of Experimental Orthopaedics, Saarland University, Homburg, Germany.
Brooke PattersonLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

Funding

Walk this Way: Physical Activity and Walking Biomechanics Lead to Early Knee OA Symptoms and Ultrasound-Detected Structural Pathology after ACL ReconstructionK01AR081389 · NIAMS · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Harkey · 2022 to 2026
$689k
Deconstructing Disparities in Lupus PregnanciesK23AR082991 · NIAMS · HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY · PI Bella Mehta · 2024 to 2026
$528k
NIAMS NIH HHS K01 AR081389NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR082991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming musculoskeletal research, offering new approaches to diagnosis, prognosis, and patient management in osteoarthritis (OA). However, implementation and ethical challenges persist. This manuscript summarizes insights from the OARSI 2025 Pre-Congress Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Osteoarthritis Research, highlighting opportunities and challenges in applying AI across biomechanics, imaging, and clinical research domains. Design: The workshop, organized by the OARSI Early Career Investigator Committee and co-chaired by Drs. Matthew Harkey and Brooke Patterson, convened experts to discuss the use of AI in real-world biomechanics data collection, radiomics for imaging-based biomarkers, and large language models (LLMs) for clinical and research applications. Emphasis was placed on the need for interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical oversight. Results: In biomechanics, AI-driven markerless motion capture and wearable sensors enable scalable, ecologically valid data collection, though issues such as class imbalance, data privacy, and model interpretability remain. In imaging, radiomics and deep learning models show promise for early OA detection and progression prediction but face challenges in domain adaptation and external validation. In clinical research, LLMs can streamline documentation and thematic analysis but must address concerns around bias, data security, and transparency. Across domains, transparency, reproducibility, and ethical use of AI were emphasized as critical for maintaining scientific rigor. Conclusions: Cross-disciplinary collaboration and AI literacy are essential to responsibly advance AI integration in OA research. The workshop's collective insights call for ethical, patient-centered approaches that leverage AI's strengths while preserving research integrity and trust.

Indexed as

BiomechanicsEthicsGenerative AIImaging biomarkersLarge language models

Identifiers

PMID41078570
PMCPMC12510192

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.